“When the judge ruled that critical information was inadmissible, Stan persevered.”
Stan represented my son. Stan worked well and was respectful of my son. He was prepared for the trial. Stan has a professional and considerate court demeanor which I believe has a positive influence with the jurors. When the judge ruled that critical information was inadmissible, Stan persevered. He maintained a positive outlook that helped keep my son calm during the trial. His overwhelmingly respectful and considerate court presence, together with his knowledge of the law made Mr. Glisson an excellent selection. We chose him based on references of a friend and were very satisfied.
- Anonymous
